Closed cweiske closed 11 years ago
Good idea! What about a simple sentence and a reference to the pingback-chapter at the sender-discovers-receiver-endpoint chapter (https://github.com/converspace/webmention/tree/v0.2#sender-discovers-receiver-endpoint) ???
BTW. I think it would be nicer to move the "sender-discovers-receiver-endpoint" to an extra chapter to describe the autodiscovery part a bit more detailed!
Please also switch the order of the attributes in the HTML link tag.
Pingback uses <link rel href>
, webmention currently <link href rel>
. Implementations that support both webmention and pingback could use a single regexp if the <link rel href>
would be enforced by the webmention spec.
+1
@cweiske @pfefferle demanding strictly ordered + laid out HTML makes things easier for consumers at the expense of publishers, which is a known anti-pattern. We should optimise for ease of publishing.
Also, many implementations are already parsing the target HTML for reply-contexts (e.g. @aaronpk (example), @jschweisnberg (example and myself (example)), demonstrating that parsing HTML is not a significant barrier.
(originally posted http://waterpigs.co.uk/notes/4SFGod/)
It's better to make libs available that make this easy (like https://github.com/phpish/link_header) than enforce artificial restrictions.
The pingback specification hard-codes the link header format so one can run a regexp on the HTML instead of having to parse it. Webmention should do the same.
The same could to be done with the HTTP Link header - the
<
and>
around the link, and double quotes around the relation.