Closed pfefferle closed 5 years ago
i'm going to pretend this is a democracy and cast a yes vote for this. :P
Feel free to send in a pull request for this.
Should we "recommend" or "require" it???
Do you have a reason to "require" it?
As i said... To enable mentions via JavaScript...
I meant something along the lines of "Considering the increasing popularity of static sites/blogs these days, it might make sense to require cors. Although this will allow the ability to send webmentions via JS, they'll still require a third party service to accept webmentions. Which means if you decide to accept webmentions via JS you cannot respond back to them."
Then we can talk about the pro/cons about allowing people to talk without giving us the ability to talk back to them.
@sandeepshetty that sounds perfect!
Based on my comment above about the asymmetry, I'm leaning towards a SHOULD or MAY, unless someone has a strong reason for a MUST.
Should we require the cors header (Access-Control-Allow-Origin: *) to enable webmentions via javascript?