questionary to replace click prompts and choices (done) -> fix create tests

[Zethson]

https://github.com/CITGuru/PyInquirer/blob/master/README.rst

Could make our click prompts and especially the choices much nicer and interactive.

Advantages and disadvantages when it comes to scaling.

Let's discuss this.

[Zethson]

@filipdutescu Just added you here since we want to discuss this with you at some later point.

[Zethson]

Draft is up on questionary branch.

PyInquirer is awful maintained and has some issues.

Questionary seems to be perfectly fine.

Mixing click and questionary results in weird behavior when echo -e <- it aborts after the questionary prompts. No damn clue why.

-> We would need to replace every click prompt with questionary prompts.

Think this would be fine, since it would to a more consistent style anyways.

@Imipenem

[Zethson]

Only thing I dislike are the default values, but we can discuss that on Discord.

[Zethson]

Just a note for me, we can easily code this ourselves.

[Zethson]

def unsafe_ask(self, patch_stdout: bool = False) -> Any:
    """Ask the question synchronously and return user response.
    Does not catch keyboard interrupts."""

    if patch_stdout:
        with prompt_toolkit.patch_stdout.patch_stdout():
            return self.application.run()
    else:
        return self.application.run()

-> can also use the unsafe ask

[Zethson]

I have to fix all workflows and tests to close this.

[Zethson]

Now we have to figure out how to do the tests.

[Zethson]

@Imipenem I doubt that we'll get an answer haha.

What was your "hardcore" mocking idea about the tests again?

And the respective advantages and disadvantages?

[Zethson]

https://github.com/tmbo/questionary/issues/49#issuecomment-652574068

We got an answer and should discuss this over the next couple of days.