Adapt new template functions to GIthub Wiki

[PatrickGrub]

The current wiki has a old state: https://github.com/coolOrangeLabs/powerGateTemplate/wiki

It should be updated:

• [X] Installation page
  • Is missing powerEvents
  • Install paths are wrong
  • Something else?
• [X] Add a new page and explain how to export, change and import the powerGateCOnfig.xml
• [X] Add a new page for the PDF job see #57
• [X] Add a new page for the powerEvents restriction see #56
• [x] ERP Serach (vault) and Inventor search
  • Old screenshots, replace with new screenshots
  • Create Mapping tables
  • Link this page in other pages like Inventor/Vault workflow
• [x] Vault material workflow
  • Old screenshots, replace with new screenshots of "ERP Item" tab
  • Make Mapping tables more easy/inutive to understand
• [x] Inventor material workflow
  • Old screenshots, replace with new screenshots of Inventor mask
  • Create Mapping tables
• [x] BOM workflow
  • Old screenshots, replace with new screenshots of Inventor mask
  • Make Mapping tables more easy
  • Describe also that "Structured" BOm must be enabled (see #53)
  • Describe also that AutoCAD Boms are supported but without Xrefs and if the properties are the same like in Inventor

[PatrickGrub]

Only missing followin page to finish:

• https://github.com/coolOrangeLabs/powerGateTemplate/wiki/BOM-Workflow +https://github.com/coolOrangeLabs/powerGateTemplate/wiki/ERP-BOM-Mapping

[PatrickGrub]

I have created a lot of new pages and new content now.

I would like to have feedback for the whole wiki until 19.06 from you in order to make the wiki simple, clear and without typos. After the date, I will give @georgschwienbacher the GO in order to use it for the new powerGate projects.

Reviewers: @georgschwienbacher @lustricker @christiangessner @AlexQua @manfredmalleier

Write your feedback as comments then we can discuss it together. Thanks for the cooperation!

[AlexQua]

Ich weiß zwar nicht was praktisch Sinnvoll ist für die Entwickler als issue zu haben (mit Ausnahme von 1/2 issues), allerdings konnte ich keine größeren Fehler entdecken. Also von mir aus passt das so weit. @PatrickGrub

[georgschwienbacher]

Passt für mich. Finde besonders die relativen links mit [[Wikiname | irgendeinewikiseite]] gut, da wir uns so in Zukunft einiges an Arbeit ersparen und nicht ständig die Links ändern müssen

[PatrickGrub]

Danke für die paar Rückmeldungen, wie angekündigt schließe ich den issue. Für spätere Rückmeldung einfach hier nachtragen oder neuen issue.