Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago
Hello, thank you very much for the bug report, could you please provide the
exact
Redis configuration and the script you used to stress test it? Thanks
Original comment by anti...@gmail.com
on 22 May 2009 at 2:30
Never mind, was able to reproduce the issue myself, this was not discovered
before
because is related to command pipelining that is rarely used. Ok let's fix
this...
Original comment by anti...@gmail.com
on 22 May 2009 at 2:46
Antirez, do you need stress script yet? I have no such at this moment. We are
using
redis in semi-production enviroment. May be problem appears due to some network
issues between client and server?
Config:
daemonize yes
pidfile /home/memd/redis/var/run/redis.pid
port 6379
timeout 300
save 900 1
save 300 10
save 60 10000
dir /home/memd/redis/var/lib/redis/
loglevel debug
logfile /home/memd/redis/var/log/redis.log
databases 1
glueoutputbuf yes
shareobjects no
Original comment by vereteln...@gmail.com
on 22 May 2009 at 3:00
No it's just a problem with command pipelining, I can fix it with the test
script I
wrote myself. This was a valuable bugfix, thank you, I'm already debugging the
issue
to fix it. The fix will be trivial, what is not is to find the exact conditions
generating the issue :) A matter of some hour and I'll kill this nasty bug!
.... ;)
Original comment by anti...@gmail.com
on 22 May 2009 at 3:04
Ok problem tracked. Quick fix: "glueoutputbuffers no" in redis.conf.
Proper fix in the next hours.
Cheers,
Salvatore
Original comment by anti...@gmail.com
on 22 May 2009 at 4:10
Bug fixed in Redis-git, thanks for the help.
Original comment by anti...@gmail.com
on 22 May 2009 at 4:36
Is it correct to apply patch to Redis 0.096? Or it's better to wait for next
release?
Original comment by vereteln...@gmail.com
on 22 May 2009 at 5:32
For 0.096 the best thing to do is to set glueoutputbuffer to no in the
redis.conf
file, btw a new tar.gz, redis 0.100 will be released in one/two days at max.
Cheers
Original comment by anti...@gmail.com
on 22 May 2009 at 5:37
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
vereteln...@gmail.com
on 22 May 2009 at 2:19Attachments: