Open JohnGeek-dev opened 3 months ago
Same problem here but with directus. It is however not dependant on a service I assume, but rather on the environment handling.
Version: v4.0.0-beta.306
If you just need to reveal the locked secret values, you can simply run the env
command inside your container, using the Command
tab.
Nope I really want to change it. Imagine (not that it would have happened to me 🙃) you need to pass an FQDN into your service, you locked it and now the FQDN should change. I am not sure if it's expected behaviour to just delete the locked env record and create one with the same name. Or is it?
Maybe @andrasbacsai could give us an explanation what the philosophy of locked environment variables is since I didn't find anything in the docs.
Nope I really want to change it. Imagine (not that it would have happened to me 🙃) you need to pass an FQDN into your service, you locked it and now the FQDN should change. I am not sure if it's expected behaviour to just delete the locked env record and create one with the same name. Or is it?
Maybe @andrasbacsai could give us an explanation what the philosophy of locked environment variables is since I didn't find anything in the docs.
The locking mechanism should work like this. You lock, you could never unlock it. Only delete and create a new one.
The FQDN part (with SERVICE_FQDN
and SERVICE_URL
variables) will be fixed in the next version (I have made a bug 11 days ago that prevents to update these variables if you change the fqdn).
Description
In
v4.0.0-beta.297
(and possibly most recent version since I couldn't find any bug report on this), once an environment variable is locked, it cannot be unlocked, preventing any updates or changes to that variable even inDeveloper view
.PS: I've forgotten to test this when I upgraded to
v4.0.0-beta.306
, I've downgraded the version due to some issues when trying to deploy Supabase.Minimal Reproduction (if possible, example repository)
Developer view
.Exception or Error
No response
Version
v4.0.0-beta.297