use stm32-rs/stm32f3 crate instead of japaric/stm32f30x

copterust / alt-stm32f30x-hal

Alternative HAL implementation of embedded-hal for stm32f30x

Apache License 2.0

14 stars 3 forks source link

use stm32-rs/stm32f3 crate instead of japaric/stm32f30x #1

Closed burrbull closed 5 years ago

little-arhat commented 5 years ago

@burrbull what are the benefits of porting crate to stm32-rs? Granted, japaric's stm32f30x is unmaintained, but I was thinking about forking it and just using the fork.

I didn't follow closely stm32-rs progress and direction, do you know whether there are plans to move it under @rust-embedded control?

burrbull commented 5 years ago

stm32f30x will be sooner or later deprecated as it was with stm32f103xx What sense to fork dead repo when there is a living alternative?

Sorry, but I know nothing about the hierarchy of groups and do not want to know.

little-arhat commented 5 years ago

Tested on f3-eva, fcfs-rtfm, and several examples from proving-ground — everything worked fine.

@burrbull It makes sense to fork (half)dead repo to make it alive under our control, but stm32rs crate seems like a more scalabale approach.

Going to merge this one, thanks for PR, @burrbull !