I take https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/core/wy5bOuXaupfSY9u_hY99U9BDLZ0 as a mandate to make Echo mitigation of amplification issues a more prominent point in ERT. (It wasn't intended as an update, as the SHOULD mentioned there is just a copy of the original 7252 SHOULD and we "provide one way", but no objections from me either).
Along that I'd offer concrete size numbers, and a note that this really needs piggy-backed responses.
Unless objected to, I'd take this into the next version of ERT (as soon as I have processed any other pending comments if there still are any).
I take https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/core/wy5bOuXaupfSY9u_hY99U9BDLZ0 as a mandate to make Echo mitigation of amplification issues a more prominent point in ERT. (It wasn't intended as an update, as the SHOULD mentioned there is just a copy of the original 7252 SHOULD and we "provide one way", but no objections from me either).
Along that I'd offer concrete size numbers, and a note that this really needs piggy-backed responses.
Unless objected to, I'd take this into the next version of ERT (as soon as I have processed any other pending comments if there still are any).