As we now aim for complete coverage of URIs, we'll need text-or-pet for the fragment just as well; the fragment may contain subdelims and "@", ":", "/" and "?" in unencoded form, so #@ is distinct from #%40 because "@" is reserved.
Unlike the other text-or-pet this has no delimiter it's split up from, but #, [ and ] would probably still have their percent-encoded forms map to parts of the non-pet text because they can be there (because like with host names, we should strive for consistency with path and query where our mapping is fixed already in 7252).
As we now aim for complete coverage of URIs, we'll need text-or-pet for the fragment just as well; the fragment may contain subdelims and "@", ":", "/" and "?" in unencoded form, so
#@is distinct from#%40because "@" is reserved.Unlike the other text-or-pet this has no delimiter it's split up from, but
#,[and]would probably still have their percent-encoded forms map to parts of the non-pet text because they can be there (because like with host names, we should strive for consistency with path and query where our mapping is fixed already in 7252).