core-wg / oscore-key-update

Other
0 stars 0 forks source link

Register EDHOC EAD items for signaling KUDOS support #55

Closed rikard-sics closed 1 year ago

rikard-sics commented 1 year ago

May be a good idea

rikard-sics commented 1 year ago

True/False value in EAD 2 and 3. And a Null in EAD 1 for signaling to the responder whether to include info in EAD 2 or not. And possibly a Null in EAD 2 to say if the initiator should include info in EAD 3.

The Null means the other party must include information in the next EAD. True also means the other party must include information. For False the other party does not have to include information.

rikard-sics commented 1 year ago

For the actual values, instead of null, true, false we can use byte strings '', '00' and '01.

rikard-sics commented 1 year ago

'01' can be for supporting FS mode, and '02' for supporting no-FS mode.

rikard-sics commented 1 year ago

Not strong feedback during interim, we can come back with a more explicit and detailed proposal.

rikard-sics commented 1 year ago

See EDHOC draft. See also https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-selander-ace-ake-authz/