coreos / coreos-assembler

Tooling container to assemble CoreOS-like systems
https://coreos.github.io/coreos-assembler/
Apache License 2.0
333 stars 165 forks source link

build: Install new Buildah rpm in testing repo #3759

Closed ravanelli closed 4 months ago

ravanelli commented 4 months ago
jlebon commented 4 months ago

The usual way to fast-track specific packages into cosa is via the continuous tags. I've ran

{pet ~}$ koji add-pkg f39-coreos-continuous buildah --owner jlebon
Adding 1 packages to tag f39-coreos-continuous
{pet ~}$ koji tag-build f39-coreos-continuous buildah-1.35.0-1.fc39
Created task 114947122
Watching tasks (this may be safely interrupted)...
114947122 tagBuild (noarch): free
114947122 tagBuild (noarch): free -> assigned
114947122 tagBuild (noarch): assigned -> closed
  0 free  0 open  1 done  0 failed

114947122 tagBuild (noarch) completed successfully

https://jenkins-fedora-coreos-pipeline.apps.ocp.fedoraproject.org/blue/organizations/jenkins/build-cosa/detail/build-cosa/758/pipeline should have it.

If we always want Buildah faster, then we can add it to the list of packages we get from updates-testing in the next line. But I don't think that's the case here.

ravanelli commented 4 months ago

The usual way to fast-track specific packages into cosa is via the continuous tags. I've ran

{pet ~}$ koji add-pkg f39-coreos-continuous buildah --owner jlebon
Adding 1 packages to tag f39-coreos-continuous
{pet ~}$ koji tag-build f39-coreos-continuous buildah-1.35.0-1.fc39
Created task 114947122
Watching tasks (this may be safely interrupted)...
114947122 tagBuild (noarch): free
114947122 tagBuild (noarch): free -> assigned
114947122 tagBuild (noarch): assigned -> closed
  0 free  0 open  1 done  0 failed

114947122 tagBuild (noarch) completed successfully

https://jenkins-fedora-coreos-pipeline.apps.ocp.fedoraproject.org/blue/organizations/jenkins/build-cosa/detail/build-cosa/758/pipeline should have it.

If we always want Buildah faster, then we can add it to the list of packages we get from updates-testing in the next line. But I don't think that's the case here.

Great! Good know, thanks for adding it! Yes, for now we just want this new manifest feature to support it the way they need