Open travier opened 4 months ago
I did the Butane one as it was more pressing with the failed build in F40. The other ones we can do progressively.
I am not sure that coreos should think of ostree/rpm-ostree as "our packages" here
I am not sure that coreos should think of ostree/rpm-ostree as "our packages" here
man, I feel this needs to be expanded on.
I assume you mean ostree/rpm-ostree should be co-maintained by every team/org involved in contributing to these.
But do you object to having this checklist here?
Is there a reason not to do this for ostree/rpm-ostree?
or you just want for us to be very specific with the wording and say something like packages we maintain and co-maintain?
I've updated the title. I did not want to imply that we own those, but that generally maintain the packages in Fedora.
Its a work under progress:
Posting the links here for reference.
CLHM:
rust -afterburn
rust-bootupd
rust-coreos-installer
rust-ssh-key-dir
greenboot
@travier The ostree & rpm-ostree specs seem to have ix86 excluded.
In this PR comment, it was recommend to drop ExclusiveArch: %{rust_arches}
in addition to adding the ExcludeArch
as it is no longer required for building on Fedora or RHEL. The ostree & rpm-ostree seem to have the ExclusiveArch: %{rust_arches}
in the spec file. In that case, do we remove it in ostree & rpm-ostree?
Describe the enhancement
Remove i686 builds for packages maintained by the team.
See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/EncourageI686LeafRemoval
To do:
Done: