search

cornelisnetworks / opa-psm2

Other
37 stars 29 forks source link

autotools #3

Closed jeffhammond closed 6 years ago

jeffhammond commented 8 years ago

In order to build PSM2 from source using an installation of libuuid that is not in /usr, one has to hack buildflags.mak by hand. It would be nice if PSM2 had an autotools-based build system that was flexible w.r.t. the paths of its dependencies. Another benefit is the potential to support out-of-place builds.

If you are amenable to autotools but do not have the resources to implement it, I will try to work on it. (I am employed by Intel, in case it matters.)

pjreger commented 8 years ago

Hi,

Just to let anyone know who is subscribed to this list, I am working directly, offline with Jeff on this topic. If anyone is interested in this topic, please let me know and I will copy you or the list – depending on the interest level.

Thanks,

Paul Reger 503 613 4617 paul.j.reger@intel.commailto:paul.j.reger@intel.com

From: Jeff Hammond [mailto:notifications@github.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2016 5:42 PM To: 01org/opa-psm2 Subject: [01org/opa-psm2] autotools (#3)

In order to build PSM2 from source using an installation of libuuid that is not in /usr, one has to hack buildflags.mak by hand. It would be nice if PSM2 had an autotools-based build system that was flexible w.r.t. the paths of its dependencies. Another benefit is the potential to support out-of-place builds.

If you are amenable to autotools but do not have the resources to implement it, I will try to work on it. (I am employed by Intel, in case it matters.)

— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/01org/opa-psm2/issues/3, or mute the threadhttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe/AHNjSRY-yAmtQAlgMJjEKJNwrakZOIEVks5qJ2E9gaJpZM4Ixiiu.