Closed MikeMcC399 closed 2 years ago
Note also the explicit explanation in Einrichtungsbezogene Impfpflicht.
"Die Nachweise von Personen, die nur zwei Impfungen in Anspruch genommen haben (oder nur eine in den Fällen des § 22a Absatz 1 Satz 2 IfSG) laufen damit mit Ablauf des 30. September 2022 ab. Diese Personen sind verpflichtet gem. § 20a Absatz 4 IfSG der Leitung der Einrichtung oder des Unternehmens innerhalb eines Monats nach Ablauf der Gültigkeit des bisherigen Nachweises einen neuen Nachweis vorzulegen. "
Implicitly this says that two doses will no longer be effective. Instead three are required.
So either the sentence "Your vaccination protection is effective." should be removed for a 2/2 vaccination or it should be replaced with something which explains more explicitly about the need for a booster dose.
Also, the question is what status do I have in e.g. the following case:
Am I "Vollständig geimpft/immunisiert", even after 01.10.2022?
CCL should definitely be made ready so that the general public can trust that the data CWA is displaying is accurate and correct.
@Ein-Tim
This issue is about the CCL string VACCINATION_STATE_COMPLETE_IMMUNIZATION_LONG_TEXT
https://github.com/corona-warn-app/cwa-app-ccl/blob/1fc1373df47d5025dc87377a1421fe51fa52abf5/resources/i18n/de/strings.xml#L86-L87
This string is not used for recovery situations.
If you have a question about the CCL response for somebody who has been infected please put it in a separate issue to avoid confusion. Other strings would be displayed in this case.
@MikeMcC399 I'll add my comment to https://github.com/corona-warn-app/cwa-wishlist/issues/820 as it better fits there.
@MikeMcC399 @Ein-Tim thanks for bringing this up. No worries, the changes from IfSG that become effective as of Oct 1, 2022 are scheduled to be reflected in CCL 3.3 which is planned to be released with CWA 2.27.
@mlenkeit
... the changes from IfSG that become effective as of Oct 1, 2022 are scheduled to be reflected in CCL 3.3 which is planned to be released with CWA 2.27.
Thank you for reassuring us that the legal changes which take effect on Oct 1, 2022 are being looked after!
I changed the title of this issue, since the logic as well as the text is changing.
The final resolution depends on the release of CCL 3.3 and CWA 2.27.
Note: The string VACCINATION_STATE_COMPLETE_IMMUNIZATION_LONG_TEXT
being prepared in release/3.3.x has changed to:
which resolves the issue described in the original posting here.
Problem description
Starting on Oct 1, 2022 the definition of "vollständiger Impfschutz" in IfSG § 22a requires 3 vaccinations (in the simple case) instead of 2.
The CCL text for a 2/2 vaccination certificate is (
VACCINATION_STATE_COMPLETE_IMMUNIZATION_LONG_TEXT
):"You have received all vaccinations for basic immunization. Your vaccination protection is effective. Please also find out about the recommended booster vaccinations."
https://github.com/corona-warn-app/cwa-app-ccl/blob/1fc1373df47d5025dc87377a1421fe51fa52abf5/resources/i18n/de/strings.xml#L86-L87
which changes to (
VACCINATION_STATE_COMPLETE_BOOSTER_LONG_TEXT
):"You have received all currently recommended vaccinations. Your vaccination protection is complete."
https://github.com/corona-warn-app/cwa-app-ccl/blob/1fc1373df47d5025dc87377a1421fe51fa52abf5/resources/i18n/de/strings.xml#L55-L56
with a 3/3 vaccination certificate.
Question
Will it still be correct to say "Your vaccination protection is effective." / "Ihr Impfschutz ist wirksam." starting on Oct 1, 2022 if the corresponding law IfSG § 22a implies that the vaccination only becomes fully effective after basic vaccination and a booster?
Related issue
Reference