Closed jihoonl closed 9 years ago
:+1:
:-1:
ㅋㅋㅋ
ㅇㅇ, 할거야 as soon as I have a first beta
네! Just letting you know that raised this issue because I couldn't compile the code in my pc..
See issue #26
I'm a bit uneasy with exploding the number of repos.... mostly because we tend to have 1 repo - package! What makes all a bit "noisier" and less comfortable for releasing (duplicates work) and git management (imho).
In this particular case, I think don't make a lot of sense to split repo, as the editor is useless without the server, and the server is of few use without the tool that creates the content it server!
Messages and client libraries ok, as clients will hardly need the server stuff, by definition.
Hm.. IMO, having four repository(Server, Client, Msg, and Visualization) with meaning sounds reasonable.
rviz_plugin would bring many visualization dependency which would not need for server. I imagine the world canvas server runs in the backbone system(which wouldn't have monitor) and serves the system as database. And users control the server data through client library.
Um... if you are concerned about explosion of number of repositories, how about moving the rviz and rqt stuffs into world_canvas_libs
repository? Since client libraries are directly used in the rviz_plugin, I think it would be another way.
OK, I see the point. Maybe you are right. Let's talk it in our next skype meeting.
But not on world_canvas_libs repository, as this must be as lightweight as possible cause contains client libraries that can be installed by many end users
:+1: for a new repo named world_canvas_tools
I think it would be better if world_canvas_server is independent from rviz plugin. How do you think?