Closed jihoonl closed 9 years ago
Yep, I tried to maintain similar APIs in both C++ and Py. But in general I'm in favor of coding standards, so... I'm not against using Pep8. But I think most of the code is conformant, apart form the methods names
OK, let's do Pep8.
Btw, also rearrange methods headers, as I put the description below the parameters and return values!
I just renamed methods, but I think most of the code was already conformant. Please re-open if other Pep8 are not respected.
It is a suggestion. Python code used in rocon project follows pep8(python styling guideline) which is recommended by ROS styleguide.
How about following this? It is a bit different from cpp style. Would it be good to keep the function name same as cpp library? How do you think @stonier?
FYI,
ROS Python style guide : http://wiki.ros.org/PyStyleGuide Pep8 : http://legacy.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0008/