Open flowchartsman opened 1 year ago
I haven't really looked at the code closely, so can you explain in more detail what this is doing?
Is it expanding ENV variables declared in a .env
file prior to running commands?
Does this happen for all prep commands?
Does it do anything else?
What are the benefits of this over a developer using something like godotenv on their own?
I'm hesitant to add this as it seems like more things to manage and document. It could confuse people who aren't expecting modd to do anything with a .env
file. And also because I barely have time to handle my own workload, let alone manage more PRs here 🤣
Sure thing! Apologies in advance for some of the diffs, some of it is editor styling, and a chunk of it is updating deps. Honestly, I thought the project might be set for archival, so much of this is to support my own usage, and the PR is kind of an "in case this is still maintained and you can get something useful from it" sort of situation. I understand the demands of work/open source balance. Think of this as a WIP to cherry pick from or something I can trim down if you like.
So, for my use-case, I use modd for local development on a single-module project with a few different microservices, using containers for my downstream dependencies. My modd.conf spins up the services I want to live code on, rebuilding them when I need. So far so good. The services configure themselves using the environment, and it's handy to be able to change these values in one place. I can't change them in the modd.conf
, so I thought it would be convenient to have them in .env
files. Also, sometimes I want to try out a couple different variations, and it's easy to add a new .env
file and temporarily comment out a single line in the modd conf without any intention of checking anything in. It also lets me keep the testing/live coding environment out of the repository.
The PR also adds the ability to expand environment variables in the commands issued by modd
itself, such as daemon
prep
and indir
, which I found useful for building things into $TMPDIR
among others.
With regards to confusing people, that's 100% your call to make as the maintainer, since it's your project and your vision. For my part, I was confused that modd did not provide any functionality with regards to environment. As I saw it, anything that controls services with a config file benefits from some sort of environment handling, even if it's just a plain env
directive, and I can certainly see users wanting to have more than one conf file that doesn't change more than environment settings for the different programs it rebuilds. Using .env
files was expedient for me, which is why I didn't implement a plain env
keyword, though I plan to, and I can see them working in concert to have overrides for single values in the .env
files. It's just more flexible this way. If you disagree, well I have my fork, and I won't lose any sleep over it.
If you think some part of this might be useful, I am happy to discuss, amend, withdraw or reissue. It's your show!
Is it expanding ENV variables declared in a .env file prior to running commands?
The env file stuff doesn't expand anything. It's simple KV environment variables that it adds into the environment of subprocess calls, such as daemons, for which it is intended.
Does this happen for all prep commands?
Edit: yes, actually, I believe it does in the current implementation. At least for prep commands within that block. Env is added to the block when the directive is encountered. It doesn't need to do it this way, and can be modified to be cumulative and additive if necessary. Or it can apply only to the daemons, which is its intended use in the first place.
cmd/service1/**/*.go {
prep +onchange: go build -o ./.devbuild ./cmd/service1
envfile: dev/config/env
envfile: dev/config/env.private
daemon +sigterm: ./.devbuild/service1
}
cmd/service2/**/*.go {
prep +onchange: go build -o ./.devbuild ./cmd/service2
envfile: dev/config/another.env.maybe
indir: ./.devbuild
daemon +sigterm: service2
}
Does it do anything else?
It expands environment variables in commands and indir
. This is orthogonal to the .env
file functionality. Sorry for the conflation. They're separate features.
What are the benefits of this over a developer using something like godotenv on their own?
This allows services to continue being configured the way they would in a container (if they're using the environment). godotenv
requires the service to have a dependency and to be aware of the .env
file. Why bother with that just for testing and development, when that's usually the purview of the orchestrator?
I don't see me really diving into this PR for at least a couple months. I know that sounds nuts, but I need to prioritize a few other projects and I really don't have too much time to manage this aside from trying to keep it working. Just letting you know so you don't take it the wrong way :smile:
No problems here. It's fire-and-forget as far as I'm concerned.
On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 12:47 PM Jon Calhoun @.***> wrote:
I don't see me really diving into this PR for at least a couple months. I know that sounds nuts, but I need to prioritize a few other projects and I really don't have too much time to manage this aside from trying to keep it working. Just letting you know so you don't take it the wrong way 😄
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/cortesi/modd/pull/125#issuecomment-1476587989, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAHCJJG3RZMV4DBAGAHNGQDW5CCZ3ANCNFSM6AAAAAAU64SIOE . You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: @.***>
This PR addresses support for cumulative environment modification with .env files as well as OS environment variable expansion in commands and the
indir
directive.