I'm using phy==2.0b1 on kilosort2 output for neuropixels data, and the ordering of channels in the TraceImageView seems incorrect. It appears as if the channel positions were not used to reorder the traces when generating the image (since the bank/probe-location changes back and forth every two channel):
Note that channels are ordered correctly on the TraceView:
And the channel positions stored in both TraceView.channel_positions and TraceImageView.channel_positions seem to be correct.
Any idea what might be going on, and whether I'm missing something?
Thanks a lot!
Tom
Hi,
I'm using phy==2.0b1 on kilosort2 output for neuropixels data, and the ordering of channels in the
TraceImageView
seems incorrect. It appears as if the channel positions were not used to reorder the traces when generating the image (since the bank/probe-location changes back and forth every two channel):Note that channels are ordered correctly on the
TraceView
:And the channel positions stored in both
TraceView.channel_positions
andTraceImageView.channel_positions
seem to be correct. Any idea what might be going on, and whether I'm missing something? Thanks a lot! Tom