cortner / JuLIPMaterials.jl

Collection of Tools for Computational Materials Science
Other
9 stars 3 forks source link

Higher-Order Boundary Conditions - Part 1 #11

Open cortner opened 6 years ago

cortner commented 6 years ago

CC @thudso @jjbraun

I want to use this issue to discuss anything coming up in the implementation for the next paper.

TODO

Am I missing anything?

cortner commented 6 years ago

@thudso @jjbraun can either of you remind me whether we actually need the Lattice Green's function in a first instance? I can't quite remember what the conclusion was.

thudso commented 6 years ago

CLE dislocation predictors are running fine (tests pass); I don't think you're missing anything. If I remember right, I think we can do without the atomistic Green's function, but then we do definitely need to solve the PDE (but @jjbraun can confirm!).

cortner commented 6 years ago

so are you saying you are actually getting the correct decay rates for the forces?

thudso commented 6 years ago

Ah, sorry; I had forgotten about this issue. I will look into it.

On 9 Mar 2018, at 20:58, Christoph Ortner notifications@github.com<mailto:notifications@github.com> wrote:

so are you saying you are actually getting the correct decay rates for the forces?

— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/cortner/JuLIPMaterials.jl/issues/11#issuecomment-371943189, or mute the threadhttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ASQ2lwvT9aTfg6c3G43Mr5SPyyqSKbxoks5tcu0OgaJpZM4SjLV9.

cortner commented 6 years ago
error-c1

This shows the convergence of the dipole tensor for a vacancy in a Lennard-Jones FCC material. @jjbraun does this match your result? If not, what are possible reasons? (e.g. I didn't pre-relax, i.e. the reference crystal is not stress-free, could this be a problem?)