three is sufficient for now, as this is the number we're aiming for and extending the two-coding-comparison to three should be easier than extending it to arbitrary numbers.
Maybe, because we sometimes get more than three, it would be good to be able to select the codings to compare in case there are more than 3.
three is sufficient for now, as this is the number we're aiming for and extending the two-coding-comparison to three should be easier than extending it to arbitrary numbers. Maybe, because we sometimes get more than three, it would be good to be able to select the codings to compare in case there are more than 3.