Open xipki opened 7 months ago
This is one of the currently “number only” extensions where we need to get a use case to determine if it is relevant to c509
Martin will look into ETSI standards to check if this extension is relevant, but other input is also welcome!
we agree to include this in the upcoming COSE presentation to ask for input
The ASN.1 syntax:
RFC 3739
ETSI EN 319 412-5
ETSI TS 119 495
CBOR: below is my proposed suggestion:
We need a new "Figure X: C509 Statement Identifiers", and the following syntax: