Table of relative line intensities (Sourcery refactored)

[sourcery-ai[bot]]

Pull Request #59 refactored by Sourcery.

Since the original Pull Request was opened as a fork in a contributor's repository, we are unable to create a Pull Request branching from it.

To incorporate these changes, you can either:

1. Merge this Pull Request instead of the original, or

2. Ask your contributor to locally incorporate these commits and push them to the original Pull Request

   Incorporate changes via command line

   git fetch https://github.com/cosimoNigro/agnpy pull/59/head
   git merge --ff-only FETCH_HEAD
   git push

NOTE: As code is pushed to the original Pull Request, Sourcery will re-run and update (force-push) this Pull Request with new refactorings as necessary. If Sourcery finds no refactorings at any point, this Pull Request will be closed automatically.

See our documentation here.

Run Sourcery locally

Reduce the feedback loop during development by using the Sourcery editor plugin:

• VS Code
• PyCharm

[sourcery-ai[bot]]

Sourcery Code Quality Report

✅  Merging this PR will increase code quality in the affected files by 0.56%.

Quality metrics	Before	After	Change
Complexity	2.63 ⭐	2.06 ⭐	-0.57 👍
Method Length	66.46 🙂	68.18 🙂	1.72 👎
Working memory	13.10 😞	13.31 😞	0.21 👎
Quality	64.39% 🙂	64.95% 🙂	0.56% 👍

Other metrics	Before	After	Change
Lines	410	408	-2

Changed files	Quality Before	Quality After	Quality Change
agnpy/targets/targets.py	64.39% 🙂	64.95% 🙂	0.56% 👍

Here are some functions in these files that still need a tune-up:

File	Function	Complexity	Length	Working Memory	Quality	Recommendation
agnpy/targets/targets.py	SSDisk.__init__	9 🙂	208 ⛔	14 😞	42.42% 😞	Try splitting into smaller methods. Extract out complex expressions
agnpy/targets/targets.py	SSDisk.u	1 ⭐	148 😞	16 ⛔	53.14% 🙂	Try splitting into smaller methods. Extract out complex expressions
agnpy/targets/targets.py	RingDustTorus.__init__	2 ⭐	92 🙂	22 ⛔	54.76% 🙂	Extract out complex expressions
agnpy/targets/targets.py	SphericalShellBLR.u	1 ⭐	136 😞	14 😞	56.85% 🙂	Try splitting into smaller methods. Extract out complex expressions
agnpy/targets/targets.py	SSDisk.sed_flux	0 ⭐	132 😞	14 😞	58.32% 🙂	Try splitting into smaller methods. Extract out complex expressions

Legend and Explanation

The emojis denote the absolute quality of the code:

• ⭐ excellent
• 🙂 good
• 😞 poor
• ⛔ very poor

The 👍 and 👎 indicate whether the quality has improved or gotten worse with this pull request.

---

Please see our documentation here for details on how these metrics are calculated.

We are actively working on this report - lots more documentation and extra metrics to come!

Let us know what you think of it by mentioning @sourcery-ai in a comment.

[codecov[bot]]

Codecov Report

Merging #60 (755af8c) into master (04786cc) will not change coverage. The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master      #60   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   94.17%   94.17%           
=======================================
  Files          30       30           
  Lines        1718     1718           
=======================================
  Hits         1618     1618           
  Misses        100      100           

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	94.17% <100.00%> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
agnpy/targets/targets.py	79.66% <100.00%> (ø)

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data Powered by Codecov. Last update 04786cc...755af8c. Read the comment docs.