search

cosmos / cosmos-sdk

:chains: A Framework for Building High Value Public Blockchains :sparkles:
https://cosmos.network/
Apache License 2.0
6.24k stars 3.6k forks source link

v0.46.0 Release #11096

Closed robert-zaremba closed 2 years ago

robert-zaremba commented 2 years ago

Summary

Tracking issue for 0.46.0.

v0.46 Release team: @amaurym @robert-zaremba @marbar3778

Before beta release

These are the pieces that need to be merged before we tag a beta.

nice to have

beta release

This phase is focused on v0.46 auditing. Once we move into this phase, we create a new branch release/v0.46.x. PRs are to be merged into master and backported to release/v0.46.x. Features, client-breaking changes and small API-breaking changes can still be merged back into the release branch if deemed necessary.

RC Blockers:

nice to haves:

rc release

Unless there's a strong requirement otherwise, this phase should be focused on bugfixes, final polishes and testnet/devnet testing. PRs are to be merged into master and backported to release/v0.46.x. Client-breaking changes and small API-breaking changes can still be merged back into the release branch if deemed necessary.

v0.46.0 release

faddat commented 2 years ago

Hi all, it looks like Notional is going to invest heavily in SDK v46, because:

I'd like to tell you about how I am thinking about constructing stacks with SDK 46, and would love comment.

Right now, I've got testnets blocked by:

In fact, that might kind of be all. The way that I have been approaching developing on this version, fully aware that there may be issues from upstream, is to update the chain daily, and I've got testing set up with the new "testnet start" command (guys, this is gold)

I think we may be able to help solve a problem.

I think the sdk is flourishing I think ibc-go is flourishing

I think they've lost touch with one another compatibility wise and that's inevitable.

I also think that cw will see really wide adoption, and I'd like to use it in a number of upcoming projects, so I'm going to get a thing going that will test:

and it occurs to me that the test platform I described there, also makes a very good template.

To build craft I used simapp as a reference very often and I got it to a place where I felt very good about its no-ibc stability.

I'm now trying to add CW (/x/wasm) to craft and that is getting tough.

Anyhow, I think that I'll iron out any issues pretty quickly and that we will soon have something that pulls all of these together.

Here are my earliest observations:

Would the SDK team like a PR of:

It could also possibly live in its own repository.

Thanks very much

PS, I just thought of something that may make what I am describing clearer:

a template with

in a ci system that

PS:

This isn't really a feature request, and is certainly not a complaint. It is more or less what I figure I'll build and would love to get feedback on.

I know everyone is super-strapped for time and resources. The needs of our clients & communities have brought this to the front for us, and if we end up doing the various upgrades, we surely don't mind :).

cyborgshead commented 2 years ago

I hope state rollback will be merged soon, waiting for this feature for years Sad to see this is nice to have in last releases for a far time

faddat commented 2 years ago

https://github.com/osmosis-labs/osmosis/issues/705

I'm pretty sure that the capabilities needed for interfluid staking start with something like ica+46+cw

amaury1093 commented 2 years ago

Just tagged v0.46.0-beta1.

tac0turtle commented 2 years ago

Boom