coderabbitai[bot]
commented
3 months ago Walkthrough
## Walkthrough The changes introduce a new `ConsumerModificationProposal` type across various files, enabling modifications to power shaping parameters and chain types for running consumer chains in the Interchain Security module. This includes updates to documentation, test cases, and workflow configurations to support and test the new proposal type. Additionally, there are several URL updates in the documentation for better accuracy and relevance. ## Changes | File(s) | Change Summary | |---------|----------------| | `.github/workflows/nightly-e2e.yml` | Added new job `partial-set-security-modification-proposal` for setting up Go, checking out LFS objects, and running E2E tests. | | `app/provider/app.go` | Added `ibcproviderclient.ConsumerModificationProposalHandler` to the list of handlers. | | `docs/docs/features/partial-set-security.md`, `docs/docs/features/power-shaping.md`, `docs/docs/features/proposals.md`, `docs/docs/frequently-asked-questions.md` | Introduced tips and details regarding the `ConsumerModificationProposal` for modifying power shaping parameters and transitioning between Top N and Opt-In chains. | | `docs/docs/validators/joining-testnet.md`, `docs/docs/validators/overview.md` | Updated URLs in the documentation to point to the new `main` subdomain for Cosmos SDK and Hub documentation. | | `tests/e2e/actions.go`, `tests/e2e/main.go`, `tests/e2e/state.go`, `tests/e2e/steps_partial_set_security.go`, `tests/e2e/test_driver.go` | Added new types, methods, and test steps for `ConsumerModificationProposal` actions to handle consumer chain modifications in E2E tests. | | `tests/integration/distribution.go` | Added a line to check the equality of `feePoolTokens` with the sum of old and new fee amounts. | | `x/ccv/provider/types/proposal.go` | Corrected a typo in the function comment for `NewConsumerModificationProposal`. | ## Sequence Diagram(s) ```mermaid sequenceDiagram participant User participant CI/CD participant GoSetup participant LFSCheckout participant E2ETests participant ProviderHandler participant TestSuite User->>CI/CD: Commit changes CI/CD->>GoSetup: Setup Go environment CI/CD->>LFSCheckout: Checkout LFS objects CI/CD->>E2ETests: Run E2E tests for `ConsumerModificationProposal` E2ETests->>ProviderHandler: Trigger `ConsumerModificationProposal` handler ProviderHandler->>TestSuite: Execute proposal actions TestSuite->>ProviderHandler: Verify proposal results ProviderHandler->>E2ETests: Return results E2ETests->>CI/CD: Report test outcomes CI/CD->>User: Notify test results ```Recent review details
**Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml** **Review profile: CHILL**Commits
Files that changed from the base of the PR and between dc4b913d13a4774a2fd606d63d96dd2956fb3527 and 0cacc4552fb75952abb69a7fde16c18f09a63759.Files selected for processing (1)
* docs/docs/features/proposals.md (2 hunks)Additional context used
Path-based instructions (1)
docs/docs/features/proposals.md (1)
Pattern `**/*.md`: "Assess the documentation for misspellings, grammatical errors, missing documentation and correctness. Please DO NOT report any missing or superfluous newlines, in particular at the end or beginning of files."
LanguageTool
docs/docs/features/proposals.md
[uncategorized] ~113-~113: A comma may be missing after the conjunctive/linking adverb ‘Otherwise’. (SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA) Context: ...ill need to include that `top_N` is 50. Otherwise `top_N` would be set to its default val...
Markdownlint
docs/docs/features/proposals.md
139-139: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1 (MD009, no-trailing-spaces) Trailing spaces --- 145-145: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1 (MD009, no-trailing-spaces) Trailing spaces --- 87-87: Expected: 1; Actual: 2 (MD012, no-multiple-blanks) Multiple consecutive blank lines --- 12-12: Expected: 1; Actual: 0; Below (MD022, blanks-around-headings) Headings should be surrounded by blank lines --- 56-56: Expected: 1; Actual: 0; Below (MD022, blanks-around-headings) Headings should be surrounded by blank lines --- 88-88: Expected: 1; Actual: 0; Below (MD022, blanks-around-headings) Headings should be surrounded by blank lines --- 22-22: null (MD031, blanks-around-fences) Fenced code blocks should be surrounded by blank lines --- 53-53: null (MD031, blanks-around-fences) Fenced code blocks should be surrounded by blank lines --- 69-69: null (MD031, blanks-around-fences) Fenced code blocks should be surrounded by blank lines --- 97-97: null (MD031, blanks-around-fences) Fenced code blocks should be surrounded by blank lines --- 128-128: null (MD031, blanks-around-fences) Fenced code blocks should be surrounded by blank lines --- 141-141: null (MD031, blanks-around-fences) Fenced code blocks should be surrounded by blank lines --- 144-144: null (MD031, blanks-around-fences) Fenced code blocks should be surrounded by blank lines --- 146-146: null (MD031, blanks-around-fences) Fenced code blocks should be surrounded by blank lines --- 153-153: null (MD031, blanks-around-fences) Fenced code blocks should be surrounded by blank lines
Additional comments not posted (1)
docs/docs/features/proposals.md (1)
`88-118`: Expand the `ConsumerModificationProposal` section to include transitioning between Top N and Opt-In chains as suggested. Also, consider adding blank lines around headings for better markdown formatting. ```diff - ## `ConsumerModificationProposal` + + ## `ConsumerModificationProposal` + ``` > Likely invalid or redundant comment.Tools
LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~113-~113: A comma may be missing after the conjunctive/linking adverb ‘Otherwise’. (SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA) Context: ...ill need to include that `top_N` is 50. Otherwise `top_N` would be set to its default val...Markdownlint
88-88: Expected: 1; Actual: 0; Below (MD022, blanks-around-headings) Headings should be surrounded by blank lines --- 97-97: null (MD031, blanks-around-fences) Fenced code blocks should be surrounded by blank lines
sainoe
Description
Adds E2E test for the
ConsumerModificationProposal, as well as docs on how to use this new type of proposal.Note that the E2E test was introduced in the
steps_partial_set_security.gofile instead of in a newsteps_modify_chain.gofile because the modification changes are partial-set security related.Author Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and please add links to any relevant follow up issues.
I have...
!to the type prefix if the change is state-machine breakingCHANGELOG.mdReviewers Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.
I have...
!the type prefix if the change is state-machine breakingSummary by CodeRabbit
New Features
ConsumerModificationProposaltype, allowing users to modify power shaping parameters and switch between Top N and Opt-In chain types for running consumer chains.Documentation
ConsumerModificationProposal, its parameters, and its impact on consumer chains.