Closed MSalopek closed 2 weeks ago
app/consumer-democracy/ante/forbidden_proposals_ante_test.go (2)
Pattern `**/*.go`: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations. --- Pattern `**/*_test.go`: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"x/ccv/provider/keeper/hooks_test.go (2)
Pattern `**/*.go`: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations. --- Pattern `**/*_test.go`: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"testutil/integration/interfaces.go (1)
Pattern `**/*.go`: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.tests/integration/democracy.go (2)
Pattern `**/*.go`: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations. --- Pattern `tests/integration/*`: "Assess the e2e test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"x/ccv/provider/client/proposal_handler.go (1)
Pattern `**/*.go`: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.tests/e2e/config.go (2)
Pattern `**/*.go`: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations. --- Pattern `tests/e2e/*`: "Assess the e2e test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"
app/consumer-democracy/ante/forbidden_proposals_ante_test.go (2)
`190-190`: LGTM! Ensure that the new `expedited` parameter is consistently set to `false` as intended across all relevant tests. --- `195-195`: LGTM! Consistency in setting the `expedited` parameter to `false` is maintained.x/ccv/provider/keeper/hooks_test.go (2)
`111-111`: LGTM! The inclusion of the `expedited` parameter with a consistent value of `false` aligns with the PR's objectives. --- `206-206`: LGTM! Consistency in setting the `expedited` parameter to `false` is maintained.testutil/integration/interfaces.go (1)
`159-159`: LGTM! The addition of the `expedited` parameter in the `SubmitProposal` method is correctly implemented and aligns with the PR's objectives.tests/integration/democracy.go (1)
`236-236`: LGTM! The inclusion of the `expedited` parameter with a consistent value of `false` aligns with the PR's objectives.x/ccv/provider/client/proposal_handler.go (4)
`110-110`: The addition of the `expedited` parameter in `NewMsgSubmitProposal` aligns with the new requirements for supporting expedited proposals. Ensure that this new parameter is documented and tested appropriately. --- `166-166`: The consistent use of the `expedited` parameter in `NewMsgSubmitProposal` across different proposal types helps maintain uniformity. It's important to verify this change integrates well with the broader system where these proposals are processed. --- `230-230`: As with other proposal types, the addition of the `expedited` parameter here is consistent. Continue to ensure that all parts of the system that handle these proposals are updated to accommodate this new parameter. --- `287-287`: The addition of the `expedited` parameter here ensures that all types of proposals can be expedited if necessary. It's crucial to test this functionality thoroughly to ensure it behaves as expected under various scenarios.tests/e2e/config.go (4)
`376-376`: The addition of expedited voting period in the `SlashThrottleTestConfig` is consistent with the PR's objectives to support expedited proposals. Ensure this setting is appropriately tested for its impact on governance. --- `647-648`: The expedited voting period addition in `MultiConsumerTestConfig` should be tested across multiple consumer chains to ensure that the governance changes propagate correctly. --- `708-709`: In `ChangeoverTestConfig`, the expedited voting period has been added. This is crucial for testing how governance changes are handled during a chain changeover. It's important to ensure that this configuration does not disrupt the changeover process. --- `525-525`: The expedited voting period setting in the `DefaultTestConfig` is correctly implemented. Verify that the new configuration works as expected in the default testing scenario.
Please go to the
Preview
tab and select the appropriate sub-template:fix
,feat
, andrefactor
.Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Dependency Updates
github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk
fromv0.47.12
tov0.47.16-ics-lsm
.Tests
TestGovKeeper
interface with a newexpedited
parameter for proposal submission.