Basically, over some 'long' period of time (mutliple seismic cycles), the majority the interseismic strain accumulation time will be winding up for a big event. The smaller events will mostly follow the big ones, and all of their small recurrence intervals shouldn't add up to more than the big events.
I am not sure that this comes across in the PDFs of 'recurrence intervals'. There has to be some way to weight the recurrence intervals in the PDF:
By golly, I think I have it: Take some 'long' earthquake series (hundreds or thousands of events pulled from the frequency-magnitude distribution) and calculate the statistics on what is the time to next event, which is related to what fraction of the total time is in accumulation for earthquakes of each magnitude (or whatever, I know this is a bad way of phrasing it).
This might be essentially the same as taking the F(M) samples and multiplying it by the recurrence interval...
Basically, over some 'long' period of time (mutliple seismic cycles), the majority the interseismic strain accumulation time will be winding up for a big event. The smaller events will mostly follow the big ones, and all of their small recurrence intervals shouldn't add up to more than the big events.
I am not sure that this comes across in the PDFs of 'recurrence intervals'. There has to be some way to weight the recurrence intervals in the PDF:
By golly, I think I have it: Take some 'long' earthquake series (hundreds or thousands of events pulled from the frequency-magnitude distribution) and calculate the statistics on what is the time to next event, which is related to what fraction of the total time is in accumulation for earthquakes of each magnitude (or whatever, I know this is a bad way of phrasing it).
This might be essentially the same as taking the F(M) samples and multiplying it by the recurrence interval...