cov-lineages / pango-designation

Repository for suggesting new lineages that should be added to the current scheme
Other
1.03k stars 97 forks source link

JN.1.4 with S:T572I in Canada and US (266 seqs) #2512

Closed FedeGueli closed 2 weeks ago

FedeGueli commented 4 months ago

Formerly known as Branch 20 of https://github.com/sars-cov-2-variants/lineage-proposals/issues/1097 defined by a triple nuc mutation around Orf1a:S216 resulting in Orf1a:S216N = NSP2_S36N

Defining JN.1.4 > T18453C > G910A, Orf1a:S216N (T911A, C912A), C8668T, S:T572I (C23277T),
Query: T18453C, C8668T,G910A,C23277T Samples:90 Countries: Canada (5 states) , Us (5 states), Chile (2 regions) Japan

IDs: EPI_ISL_18654302, EPI_ISL_18654322, EPI_ISL_18654325, EPI_ISL_18654337-18654338, EPI_ISL_18729280, EPI_ISL_18732056, EPI_ISL_18756540, EPI_ISL_18768597, EPI_ISL_18769233, EPI_ISL_18769552, EPI_ISL_18772352, EPI_ISL_18772362, EPI_ISL_18779573, EPI_ISL_18780020, EPI_ISL_18787749, EPI_ISL_18803900, EPI_ISL_18810837, EPI_ISL_18826375, EPI_ISL_18826671, EPI_ISL_18839447, EPI_ISL_18839500, EPI_ISL_18839857, EPI_ISL_18856136, EPI_ISL_18863927, EPI_ISL_18868391, EPI_ISL_18874137, EPI_ISL_18882629, EPI_ISL_18892909, EPI_ISL_18897501, EPI_ISL_18897503, EPI_ISL_18908883, EPI_ISL_18913982, EPI_ISL_18914159, EPI_ISL_18914168, EPI_ISL_18914274-18914275, EPI_ISL_18917450, EPI_ISL_18920866, EPI_ISL_18927451, EPI_ISL_18927533, EPI_ISL_18928442, EPI_ISL_18928444, EPI_ISL_18928449, EPI_ISL_18928467, EPI_ISL_18928490-18928493, EPI_ISL_18933533, EPI_ISL_18933535, EPI_ISL_18933540, EPI_ISL_18933552, EPI_ISL_18933559-18933560, EPI_ISL_18933633, EPI_ISL_18933662, EPI_ISL_18935588, EPI_ISL_18937995, EPI_ISL_18938130, EPI_ISL_18945881, EPI_ISL_18945896-18945897, EPI_ISL_18946145, EPI_ISL_18946157, EPI_ISL_18946176-18946180, EPI_ISL_18946189, EPI_ISL_18946214, EPI_ISL_18946543, EPI_ISL_18946565, EPI_ISL_18950410, EPI_ISL_18950493, EPI_ISL_18950539, EPI_ISL_18950541, EPI_ISL_18950592, EPI_ISL_18956508, EPI_ISL_18956789, EPI_ISL_18959635, EPI_ISL_18959665, EPI_ISL_18959710, EPI_ISL_18959712, EPI_ISL_18959731-18959732, EPI_ISL_18959742-18959743, EPI_ISL_18959745

Tree:

Screenshot 2024-03-07 alle 09 27 27

https://nextstrain.org/fetch/genome-test.gi.ucsc.edu/trash/ct/singleSubtreeAuspice_genome_test_49a81_9794d0.json?f_userOrOld=uploaded%20sample&label=id:node_6944557

FedeGueli commented 4 months ago

@ryhisner the 910A 911A 912A could be a TRS thing?

AngieHinrichs commented 4 months ago

When I see a run of mutations in successive positions, I usually suspect a sequencing error, but maybe that's only because it makes tree-building more difficult. ?

FedeGueli commented 4 months ago

When I see a run of mutations in successive positions, I usually suspect a sequencing error, but maybe that's only because it makes tree-building more difficult. ?

Screenshot 2024-03-08 alle 09 14 12

Yes my first thought too! but here it is always with C8668T so i think it is real this time!

AngieHinrichs commented 4 months ago

These 6 sequences have the 910-12 substitutions, but don't have C8668T, and are currently placed with the other sequences in JN.1.4 but with reversions on 774 and 18453 (so they are not JN.1.4):

SouthAfrica/CERI-KRISP-K060866/2024|EPI_ISL_18931030|2024-02-05 SouthKorea/KDCA282622/2023|EPI_ISL_18823418|2023-12-30 Italy/PIE_IRCC_15897055/2023|EPI_ISL_18674017|2023-12-13 Canada/QC-L00680666001/2023|EPI_ISL_18654280|2023-11-24 USA/CA-CDPH-6000018682/2024|EPI_ISL_18940861|2024-01-16 USA/CA-GBW-H20-361-5118/2024|EPI_ISL_18945941|2024-02-16

Initially all of these sequences were placed on a JN.1 branch with a flip-flop on 1060 (before and after 910-912). When scanning around inJN.1 I saw that most of the sequences were really JN.1.4 but pulled in to the flip-flop branch by sharing 910-912 with those sequences. So I temporarily pruned the above 6 sequences and reoptimized so that the JN.1.4 sequences would be pulled into JN.1.4 by C774T and T18453C. But when the 6 sequences were added back (2024-03-06), they were now incorrectly pulled into JN.1.4 because 3 substitutions (910-912) beats 2 (774 and 18453).

Maybe it's cynicism, and it's certainly speculative, but I find it a lot easier to believe that 3 successive bases would have substitutions in different lineages (JN.1 and JN.1.4) due to sequencing errors than due to some real biological effect that would favor those 3 bases turning to 'A'. (But I know there are real exceptions like B.1.1's 28881-28883 (GGG > AAC), and @ryhisner made a plausible case for 21302,21304,21305 being real - though I still had to mask those in Delta and BA.2.86, and was tempted to mask them in prior Omicrons.)

FedeGueli commented 3 months ago

106 now

FedeGueli commented 2 months ago

163 still mostly Canada

FedeGueli commented 2 weeks ago

slowed down closing it