Closed gyebra-phs closed 2 years ago
Yes, it does seem that S:S704L has occurred more than once in BA.2. If you paste your list of IDs into the UShER web interface, all of them are found in the brand-new lineage BA.2.37 (from cov-lineages/pango-designation#572) which is in pango-designation release v1.9. @aineniamh and I are working on updating the pangoLEARN model and UShER lineage tree to include the new v1.9 lineages, and hope to release those soon.
At the moment, the most recent pangolin-data release is v1.8, and the only BA.2 lineage with S:S704L as of v1.8 is BA.2.12, which probably explains why that lineage is assigned. But when pangolin-data v1.9 is released, you should see the top cluster's assignments change to BA.2.37.
Hi Angie,
This is super helpful information, thanks for replying so quickly! It makes sense, we'll wait for the new v1.9 and compare.
Thanks a lot for the hard work!
Gonzalo
Hi there,
I have noticed that in our data Pangolin is assigning the BA.2.12 lineage to two different clades:
(Of note, the child lineage BA.2.12.1, descended from one of those clades, is monophyletic.)
Both clades have the S:S704L mutation, presumably acquired independently by the "spurious" clade on the top? Sequence IDs for the top clade are:
Any thoughts would help, many thanks!
Gonzalo