Closed ddold closed 1 year ago
I think this can be closed - the upstream repo should be the place where the change is applied, and the coveralls folks have decided against it.
Yes, unfortunately there's no workflow-scoped unique number that can be used instead of workflow id. So, to make it robust, we use workflow id.
The current setup is misleading. It is showing on coveralls as the build number, but in reality it is the workflow id of the build Built in CircleCI env variables here
I think it would be much nicer to see
1
rather than611d45e9-ed30-4eda-bff0-60130de2e8af