Open silverjam opened 10 years ago
For your information, we have a patch to limit the response to probe request to avoid the flooding of those frames in our mesh network but this is done in mac80211 not wpa_supplicant: http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-wireless/msg111464.html
So when doing the scanning, the following command should be used "iw mesh0 scan meshid" http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-wireless/msg106661.html
Isn't this bug fixed by using the wildcard meshid in the probe req?
@bcopeland Maybe, I haven't had a chance to test yet. @chunyeow OK, but we need to be able to scan from wpa_supplicant, the idea is to percolate these meshids up to the java layer-- are you saying we need to add a new type of scanning to wpa_s?
This patch should allow us to do active scanning with wildcard mesh id: https://github.com/cozybit/wpa_supplicant/commit/218b493a413837c2ef34bf1744724617e0021051
Otherwise, wpa_supplicant only relies on passive scanning which could be missed during the scanning process.
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 01:17:06AM -0700, Chun-Yeow wrote:
This patch should allow us to do so with active scanning with wildcard mesh id: https://github.com/cozybit/wpa_supplicant/commit/218b493a413837c2ef34bf1744724617e0021051
Otherwise, wpa_supplicant only relies on passive scanning which could be missed during the scanning process.
Yes, to clarify I had already made a similar patch in the wpa_s_mesh_android repository a few weeks ago, which solved it in my testing.
Bob Copeland %% www.bobcopeland.com
Issue by silverjam from Thursday Apr 03, 2014 at 17:03 GMT _Originally opened as https://github.com/cozybit/wpa_s_mesh_android/issues/24_