I’m wondering whether I encountered a bug in version 1.0.4's "replace_missing_values.py" routine: when setting the value of the "--maxi" parameter to 1 – corresponding with any "fraction of missing values allowed per sample", as per https://glint-epigenetics.readthedocs.io/en/latest/input.html – the routine still excludes samples from the output data ('xx samples were not replaced because they have more than 1.0 missing values'). Example:
$ python "<path_to_GLINT1.0.4>/replace_missing_values.py" --datafile <datafile.txt> --chr NA --maxs 0 --maxi 1 --sep " "
<path_to_GLINT1.0.4>/utils/common.py:121: FutureWarning: Method .as_matrix will be removed in a future version. Use .values instead.
first_col = DataFrame.as_matrix(read_csv(filepath, dtype=str, delimiter=delimiter, usecols=[0], header=None))
<path_to_GLINT1.0.4>/utils/common.py:177: FutureWarning: Method .as_matrix will be removed in a future version. Use .values instead.
data = DataFrame.as_matrix(data)
Replacing missing values by mean...
54 samples were not replaced because they have more than 1.0 missing values
57044 sites were not replaced because they have more than 0.0 missing values
replacing each missing value by it's site mean...
Output is saved to <datafile.txt>.no_missing_values
$
Thanks in advance for your consideration and help,
Hi there
I’m wondering whether I encountered a bug in version 1.0.4's "replace_missing_values.py" routine: when setting the value of the "--maxi" parameter to 1 – corresponding with any "fraction of missing values allowed per sample", as per https://glint-epigenetics.readthedocs.io/en/latest/input.html – the routine still excludes samples from the output data ('xx samples were not replaced because they have more than 1.0 missing values'). Example:
Thanks in advance for your consideration and help,
B.w.