codecov[bot]
commented
1 year ago Codecov Report
Base: 66.3% // Head: 66.3% // No change to project coverage :thumbsup:
Coverage data is based on head (
c44f22c) compared to base (05f36c1). Patch coverage: 100.0% of modified lines in pull request are covered.
Additional details and impacted files
```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## develop #642 +/- ## ======================================= Coverage 66.3% 66.3% ======================================= Files 103 103 Lines 28646 28646 ======================================= Hits 19000 19000 Misses 9646 9646 ``` | Flag | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | unittests | `66.3% <100.0%> (ø)` | | | with-blas | `66.3% <100.0%> (ø)` | | | with-libxsmm | `66.3% <100.0%> (ø)` | | | with-mpi | `66.6% <100.0%> (ø)` | | | with-openmp | `65.6% <100.0%> (ø)` | | | without-mpi | `65.3% <ø> (ø)` | | | without-openmp | `65.5% <100.0%> (ø)` | | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=cp2k#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more. | [Impacted Files](https://codecov.io/gh/cp2k/dbcsr/pull/642?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=cp2k) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [src/core/dbcsr\_config.F](https://codecov.io/gh/cp2k/dbcsr/pull/642/diff?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=cp2k#diff-c3JjL2NvcmUvZGJjc3JfY29uZmlnLkY=) | `58.8% <100.0%> (ø)` | | Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us [how you rate us](https://about.codecov.io/nps?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=cp2k). Have a feature suggestion? [Share it here.](https://app.codecov.io/gh/feedback/?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=cp2k):umbrella: View full report at Codecov.
:loudspeaker: Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.
Please correct if I am wrong: In MPI, I am not aware of the fact that "nodes" are commonly used terminology. From the numbers that are printed on top of each CP2K output, it seems to me that "numnodes" is the number of MPI processes that are used.