Closed blinkseb closed 7 years ago
Thanks! I expect the build failed because you're waiting for the new scales to regenerate the ref trees? But the link to jenkins seems dead...
The build should not failed since the recipe is basically the same. But:
please test
please test
please test
please test
please test one more time :man_dancing:
please please please test test test :rocket:
:champagne: :tada: :balloon:
It'd good also to implement recommendations from https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/CMSPublic/ReMiniAOD03Feb2017Notes
Seems like we do have to change the MET input tag if we want to propagate the EGM fix? => slimmedMETsMuEGClean
Pff indeed
Ah but we don't really care about that one: jets are not e/gamma corrected
=> it makes sense to use only the muon-corrected MET, which is the default collection?
For the other things did you mean the It would be extremely advisable to store the bool particleFlowEGammaGSFixed:dupECALClusters and if ecalMultiAndGSGlobalRecHitEB:hitsNotReplaced is empty or not
?
Yep that ones
I'm looking also into updating MET filters
please test
I'm trying to see if using webhooks to jenkins works with the new container infrastructure (instead of plain old cron task)
And looks like it's working :+1:
The EGMSmearing twiki has been updated with a new recipe I implemented in ab4c4bb :tada:
There's something wrong with the recipes, it pulls all packages of CMSSW instead of just the modified one... investigating
Ok should be fixed, The recipe is indeed buggy (the remote has a merge commit for the regression based on 8.1.X or 9.0.X). Let's wait for the official announcement before reporting :)
Twiki for EGMSmearing has been updated, no need to fetch giuseppe's repo anymore? https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/CMS/EGMSmearer#ECAL_scale_and_resolution_correc
Let me try it :sushi:
Much better indeed, works out-of-the-box. I'll update the PR Done.
*** Discussion title: Egamma ID
Hi,
No, this is *not* the case because we updated the E-p regression method.
Right now we use a semi-parametric method with different inputs.
I will use the numbers you measured and release a consistent version
later in the day today.
Best,
-- Rafael.
Not sure what this really means, but we should probably wait a bit :worried:
Indeed, what a mess...
As Hugues was saying earlier: there is 'mess' in 'CMS' after all :smile:
PR updated with latest smearing recipe from https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/viewauth/CMS/EGMRegression#Consistent_EGMSmearer
many thanks !
Title says everything. Please do not merge until EGM smearing is updated (the recipe will probably change)
Note: bad muons filter has been removed since user are now expected to run over reMiniAOD