Add processes to the ontology

cpfaff commented 8 years ago

Currently lacking processses in the ontology.

EichenbergBEF commented 8 years ago

Ich weiß nich ob das vom coding her wichtig ist, aber: Line 1810: "Process Name"; sollte das nicht ohne SPACE sein, also "ProcessName"? Selbiges bei : 1924, 1929, 1934 und 1971.

Außerdem: 1871-1879: double entry von "Assimilation".

Am 02.02.2016 um 11:13 schrieb Claas-Thido Pfaff:

Currently lacking processses in the ontology.

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/cpfaff/cafe/issues/79.

Dr. rer. nat. David Eichenberg BEF-China research consortium Data manager (BEF China Dataportal) Tel: 0049-341-9738587 Department of Systematic Botany and Functional Biodiversity University of Leipzig Room 120 Johannisalles 21 04103 Leipzig GERMANY

cpfaff commented 8 years ago

You see the owl file here:

It contains class definitions looking like that:

<Class rdf:about="http://www.semanticweb.org/ctpfaff/ontologies/2016/1/cafe#ProcessName">
+        <rdfs:subClassOf rdf:resource="http://www.semanticweb.org/ctpfaff/ontologies/2016/1/cafe#ProcessAspect"/>
+        <rdfs:label xml:lang="en">Process Name</rdfs:label>
+    </Class>

It is good practice to have in the uri after # the class name without spaces. Then we add a label which is the human readable format that represents what you would expect.

cpfaff / ease

Add processes to the ontology #79