issues
search
cplusplus
/
CWG
Core Working Group
23
stars
7
forks
source link
issues
Newest
Newest
Most commented
Recently updated
Oldest
Least commented
Least recently updated
[temp.over] shoudl apply to all context when overload resolution is done for function templates
#426
xmh0511
closed
10 months ago
4
What is the behavior if the program invokes an external entity
#425
xmh0511
opened
10 months ago
5
It is underspecified whether the user-implemented `atomic` can establish a synchronous relationship
#424
xmh0511
closed
10 months ago
5
LWG3980 [atomics.ref.ops] p19 Where is the wording that forbids the read operation to read the same initial value?
#423
xmh0511
closed
9 months ago
6
CWG2811 [basic.start.main] Clarify what it means to "use" `main`
#422
Eisenwave
closed
3 months ago
7
[expr.const] Clarify wording of "usable in constant expressions"
#421
mpolacek
closed
10 months ago
4
CWG2807 [class.dtor] Destructors can, and shall not be consteval
#420
cor3ntin
closed
7 months ago
1
[stmt.select.stmt.if] p1 The last sentence is a bit misleading
#419
xmh0511
opened
10 months ago
3
[basic.align] p1 should use the "minimum" to be more precise
#418
xmh0511
opened
10 months ago
0
[dcl.align.example] p1 The example should be based on some assumptions
#417
xmh0511
opened
10 months ago
7
[basic.memobj] incoherent rules regarding the arrays containing out-of-life elements
#416
sergey-anisimov-dev
opened
10 months ago
11
[basic.life] CWG2625 broke dynamic arrays providing storage
#415
languagelawyer
opened
10 months ago
8
[defns] Lambda expressions and requires expressions have no parameters
#414
Eisenwave
opened
10 months ago
2
[dcl.init.list] Avoid zero-sized backing array
#413
frederick-vs-ja
closed
10 months ago
2
CWG2840 [basic.align] Missing requirements for fundamental alignments
#412
frederick-vs-ja
opened
10 months ago
3
CWG2813 [expr.ref] Class member access currently requires glvalue, but it shouldn't
#411
brevzin
closed
3 months ago
2
CWG2791 [stmt.return],[stmt.return.coroutine] "A function returns to its caller" is unclear
#410
Eisenwave
closed
7 months ago
1
[basic.def.odr] p14.11 "present in the definition of D" is ambiguous
#409
xmh0511
opened
11 months ago
8
[temp.spec.partial.match] It is not explained how to deduce template arguments during partial specialization matching
#408
t3nsor
opened
11 months ago
7
[temp.res.general] p1 The program point `P` from which the name lookup is performed for a member name of a class that was dependent is unclear
#407
xmh0511
opened
11 months ago
0
[module.context] p3 What does "the template" refer to?
#406
xmh0511
opened
11 months ago
2
[temp.inst] p5 Does the implicit instantiation instantiate a declaration or definition of a function template specialization matter
#405
xmh0511
opened
11 months ago
0
[lex.icon] It is unclear whether the choice of extended integer type is unspecified or implementation-defined
#404
Eisenwave
opened
11 months ago
1
[basic.fundamental] Decide on a unified definition of byte-like types
#403
Eisenwave
closed
11 months ago
2
CWG2781 [basic.def.odr] "... for D itself, the behavior is as if there is a single entity with a single definition" renders the complere ODR teethless
#402
RealLitb
opened
11 months ago
10
CWG2790 [over.ics.list] p8 refers to a UDCS with an "aggregate initialization" - there is no such thing
#401
RealLitb
opened
11 months ago
1
[basic.lookup.argdep#3.sentence-5] Refers to "associated entities" of members of an overload set, rather than of call arguments
#400
RealLitb
opened
11 months ago
4
[temp.expl.spec] p7 The intent may not merely refer to implicit instantiation
#399
xmh0511
opened
11 months ago
0
[atomics.types.operations] p7 What if the supplied arguments does not denote any enumerator?
#398
xmh0511
closed
11 months ago
3
[intro.races] p13 "non-atomic scalar object" or its opposite("atomic scalar object") is underspecified LWG2506
#397
xmh0511
closed
11 months ago
1
[expr.prim.lambda.closure] p16 All major implementations don't adhere the rule
#396
xmh0511
closed
11 months ago
3
[class.access.base] p5 Whether the body of an instantiated call operator function of a lambda is within the accessible point is underspecified.
#395
xmh0511
closed
11 months ago
6
CWG2788 [basic.scope.scope]/p4 Clarifying redeclaration of corresponding functions
#394
cor3ntin
opened
11 months ago
2
[class.conv.general] p4 seems redundant
#393
cor3ntin
opened
11 months ago
1
[over.match.best] Implementations have divergence for the ambiguity between two rewritten candidates sourced from the same one
#392
xmh0511
closed
11 months ago
1
CWG2789 [over.match.best.general] Overload resolution with implicit and explicit object member candidates
#391
cor3ntin
closed
7 months ago
1
CWG2787 [special] Kind of Explicit Object Assignment Functions
#390
cor3ntin
opened
11 months ago
2
[basic.def.odr] p10 The intent is not clear
#389
xmh0511
opened
11 months ago
2
[conv.integral] The conversion from unscoped enumeration to an integer type is underspecified
#388
xmh0511
opened
11 months ago
0
[intro.execution] Sequenced before is implied but not stated to be irreflexive
#387
Eisenwave
closed
11 months ago
1
[intro.object] Inconsistent specification on whether a subobject is considered created
#386
frederick-vs-ja
opened
11 months ago
3
[basic.compound] p3 Define the term "the end of an object"
#385
xmh0511
closed
5 months ago
11
[over.match.funcs.general] p7.3 has an error-prone implication
#384
xmh0511
opened
11 months ago
0
[basic.align] p1 Whether a offset address satisfies the alignment is not clear
#383
xmh0511
closed
11 months ago
16
[expr.add] p4 Whether the array object should be during its lifetime or not?
#382
xmh0511
closed
11 months ago
16
[intro.object] There is no requirement to restrict an complete object should be within a storage
#381
xmh0511
closed
11 months ago
3
[expr.new] p16 should give more clear requirement
#380
xmh0511
opened
11 months ago
8
[intro.object.example] p1 may violates [basic.align] p1
#379
xmh0511
closed
10 months ago
0
[intro.object] Converting a pointer value that is returned from a malloc operation that creates an array object to the element type results in UB?
#378
xmh0511
opened
11 months ago
22
CWG2778 [expr.const] Conflict between constant destruction and a mutable member of a class type
#377
frederick-vs-ja
opened
11 months ago
1
Previous
Next