search

cplusplus / nbballot

Handling of NB comments in response to ballots
14 stars 4 forks source link

FR-003-010 22.14.7 [format.range] formatting of ranges of tuple-like objects #406

Closed wg21bot closed 1 year ago

wg21bot commented 1 year ago

[format.range] [tab:formatter.range.type] [format.range.fmtmap] [format.range.fmtkind]

Ranges of tuple-like objects (that are not themselves ranges) should be formatted as map or set.

Please consider treating a range of tuple-like objects of size 1 or 2 as map/sets respectively for formatting purposes.

brycelelbach commented 1 year ago

@inbal2l send this to us when it's ready.

inbal2l commented 1 year ago

Scheduled for SG9's meeting in Kona, second session (10:00-11:30): https://wiki.edg.com/bin/view/Wg21kona2022/SG9

inbal2l commented 1 year ago

Reviewed by SG9 at Kona2022 meeting (Full Minutes).

Poll

POLL: Apply the resolution suggested in: “FR#406: FR-003-010 22.14.7 (format.range) formatting of ranges of tuple-like objects”, treating a range of tuple-like objects of size 1 or 2 as sets/maps respectively for formatting purposes.

SF F N A SA
0 0 0 1 7

Attendance: 12 (onsite: 7, online: 5)

# of Authors: 0

Author’s position: n/a

Outcome: Strong consensus against

Summary

SG9 is against adopting the resolution proposed in the NB comment. Forwarded to LEWG for final decision.

The issue was forwarded to LEWG.

brycelelbach commented 1 year ago

2022-11-11 10:00 to 11:30 UTC-10 Kona Library Evolution Meeting

FR-003-010: Formatting of ranges of tuple-like objects

2022-11-11 10:00 to 11:30 UTC-10 Kona Library Evolution Minutes

Champion: Corentin Jabot (in-person)

Chair: Bryce Adelstein Lelbach & Robert Leahy

Minute Taker: Steve Downey

Start: 2022-11-11 10:08 UTC-10

POLL: Reject FR-003-010 (Formatting of ranges of tuple-like objects).

Strongly Favor Weakly Favor Neutral Weakly Against Strongly Against
10 8 1 0 0

Attendance: 17 (in-person) + 7 (remote)

# of Authors: 1

Author Position: WF

Outcome: Consensus in favor.

End: 10:21

Summary

A paper would be needed to resolve this NB comment, and none is available. The author of this NB comment believes the issue can be fixed after C++23 and is in favor of rejecting it.

Next Steps

Take a Library Evolution electronic poll to reject US NB comment FR-003-010 (Formatting of ranges of tuple-like objects).

brycelelbach commented 1 year ago

2022-11 Library Evolution Electronic Poll Outcomes

Poll 1.8: Reject C++23 National Body comment FR-003-010 Formatting Of Ranges Of tuple-like Objects and any duplicate comments.

Strongly Favor Weakly Favor Neutral Weakly Against Strongly Against
13 5 0 1 0

Outcome: Consensus in favor.

jensmaurer commented 1 year ago

There was no consensus for a change.