search

cplusplus / nbballot

Handling of NB comments in response to ballots
14 stars 4 forks source link

US 27-067 12.4.5p1 [over.sub] Static operator[] #499

Closed wg21bot closed 1 year ago

wg21bot commented 1 year ago

P1169 (static operator()), P2128 (Multidimensional subscript operator) and EWG88 all mention that operator[] should be allowed to be a static member function if operator() is allowed to be a static member function. With the adoption of both P1169 and P2128, this seems to have fallen through the cracks.

Proposed change:

Adopt P2589 (static operator[]).

jfbastien commented 1 year ago

Potential duplicate of https://github.com/cplusplus/nbballot/issues/460

erichkeane commented 1 year ago

No objection to unanimous consent that this is a duplicate as stated above.