DE-079 17.3.3 [limits.syn], 17.3.5 [numeric.limits] has_denorm

[jensmaurer]

The has_denorm and has_denorm_style traits in numeric_limits are actively misleading users and should therefore be deprecated as soon as possible. Their corresponding macros have been declared as “an obsolescent feature” in the latest ISO/IEC 9899 WD.

Proposed change:

Apply P2614R1.

[brycelelbach]

The proposed resolution is to adopt P2614 https://github.com/cplusplus/papers/issues/1278

P2614 is undergoing Library Evolution electronic polling, although that will have to be redone due to the poll stating the wrong ship vehicle (C++26 instead of C++23). Still, this doesn't need more Library Evolution input.

[mattkretz]

P2614 is undergoing Library Evolution electronic polling, although that will have to be redone due to the poll stating the wrong ship vehicle (C++26 instead of C++23).

Can't we just do a quick poll in LEWG in Kona instead? I.e. it seems like there should be an "evolution" poll on whether we want to do it for 23. I could also schedule it for SG6 on Monday, so LEWG could have the SG6 direction as input.

[brycelelbach]

No. The Library Evolution poll is nearly done. We will have the results during the meeting. Any pills we take at Kona will have to be confirmed by electronic poll anyways

-- Bryce Adelstein Lelbach aka wash (he/him/his) US Programming Language Standards Chair ISO C++ Library Evolution Chair Principal Architect @ NVIDIA

On Fri, Nov 4, 2022, 21:52 Matthias Kretz @.***> wrote:

P2614 is undergoing Library Evolution electronic polling, although that will have to be redone due to the poll stating the wrong ship vehicle (C++26 instead of C++23).

Can't we just do a quick poll in LEWG in Kona instead? I.e. it seems like there should be an "evolution" poll on whether we want to do it for 23. I could also schedule it for SG6 on Monday, so LEWG could have the SG6 direction as input.

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/cplusplus/nbballot/issues/506#issuecomment-1304435016, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AADBG4U5W5HNG4CG2Z6474TWGYG2RANCNFSM6AAAAAARWR7CQM . You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID: @.***>

[JeffGarland]

@brycelelbach exactly what day will we have them? I'd like to schedule this Mon/Tue in Kona - maybe I'll just do it 'at risk'.

[brycelelbach]

Probably tomorrow.

[mattkretz]

As the author of P2614, note that I will be chairing SG6 on Monday afternoon.

[JeffGarland]

Let's plan to see this in LWG on Tuesday morning.

[JeffGarland]

@mattkretz Scheduled for 8 am in LWG this morning

[JeffGarland]

LWG reviewd in Kona and requested changes -- will see again after updates.

[JeffGarland]

LWG has reviewed the updated paper and will move for C++23 in Kona

[JeffGarland]

@brycelelbach We still need final poll results from LEWG

[JeffGarland]

https://wiki.edg.com/bin/view/Wg21kona2022/LWG20221108-EM

poll: put P2614r2 into C++23?

F	A	N
6	0	0

[jwakely]

Accepted with modification.