Closed wg21bot closed 1 year ago
The opposite position to cplusplus/nbballot#513
This advocates against adopting P0792 https://github.com/cplusplus/papers/issues/256
Accepted. See P0792 https://github.com/cplusplus/papers/issues/256 for more details.
(Fixed label from "rejected" to "accepted" per the comment.)
There has been significant churn around function_ref (P0792) and the current design is markedly different in its handling of pointers vs pointers-to-members than any other type in the standard library.
Proposed change:
Do not rush P0792 into C++23.