Open jwakely opened 1 year ago
LWG would like SG16 to take a look at this new issue.
And so we shall.
SG16 reviewed this issue during its 2023-07-12 and 2023-07-26 meetings. The following poll was taken:
The typo referenced in the poll concerned a markup issue that was observed; the extent of the struck text did not include a trailing >
character that it should have. The proposed resolution has already been updated to address this.
This issue is now ready for LWG; I'm removing the SG16 label.
This was moved to Ready in Tokyo
https://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/issue3944
LWG would like SG16 to take a look at this new issue.