P3051 R2 Structured Response Files

[wg21bot]

P3051R0 Structured Response Files (René Ferdinand Rivera Morell)

[Bigcheese]

SG15 wants to pursue defining a common response file format starting with supporting utf8 simple command lines, accepting the limitations for non-unicode arguments for the first version.	SF	F	N	A	SA
6	6	0	0	0

Consensus

SG15 wants to persue defining common structured tool configuration arguments as part of the response file format.	SF	F	N	A	SA
6	3	3	0	0

Consensus

[Bigcheese]

SG15 wants SG16's opinion on what to do about arguments/paths that are not unambiguously encodable in unicode. Is this a large enough problem that we need to support it, and if so what would be the best way.

[tahonermann]

Thanks @Bigcheese, I'll schedule a review of the paper in a future SG16 telecon.

[wg21bot]

P3051R1 Structured Response Files (René Ferdinand Rivera Morell)

[Bigcheese]

Saint Louis:

Structured options should be an unordered dictionary instead of an ordered list.

SF	F	N	A	SA
3	5	0	0	0

Result: Consensus

std.param should look like: "param": {"pre": [], "post": []} Unanimous Consent

Forward the initial set of Ecosystem IS papers (P2656, P3342, P3051, and P2717), with the agreed changes, to EWG with the request to create a work item.	SF	F	N	A	SA
8	0	0	0	0

[wg21bot]

P3051R2 Structured Response Files (René Ferdinand Rivera Morell)

[grafikrobot]

This also need the LEWG tag, per request from @inbal2l