Open wg21bot opened 7 months ago
SG9 discussed it in Tokyo on Tuesday: https://wiki.edg.com/bin/view/Wg21tokyo2024/NotesSG9P3138R0
Naming approval poll for P3138
cache_last
: 3cache_latest
: 7cache_one
: 3cache1
: 0cache_1
: 0cache_dereference
: 6cache<1>
: 8keep_*
: 2cache
: 1dereference_once
: 1cache_deref
: 3Attendance: 12
Outcome: cache<1>
if we can have cool things, cache_latest
if not. We present this merely as data to LEWG to make an informed decision.
Poll: Forward P3138R0 to LEWG for inclusion in C++26.
SF | F | N | A | SA |
---|---|---|---|---|
8 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
Author: SF Attendance: 12 Outcome: Strong consensus in favor
Paper forwarded to LEWG (pending SG1).
the lack of implementation conformance of istreambuf_iterator points to a defect in the data races clause of the library (it should be a library defect) SF F N A SA 1 7 1 0 0 unanimous consent
we want to allow view::cache_last's input iterator (or other select cases, on a case by case basis) to also be exempted from the requirements in the data races clause of the library SF F N A SA 2 4 1 0 0 unanimous consent
we want to allow all non-forward input iterators to also be exempted from the requirements in the data races clause of the library SF F N A SA 1 1 2 2 1 SA: I don't understand nearly well enough what the consequences of doing that are not consensus
@ogiroux - is SG1 done with the paper? Or would you like to continue the review during St. Louis? (We can see it if you're done, but generally speaking, if you can take a forwarding poll that would be indicative)
Move the drive-by fix to an issue and ship p3138r1 Forward: No objection to unanimous consent
SG1 is done with this.
P3138R0 views::cache_last (Tim Song)