Open jwakely opened 3 months ago
SG9 and LWG met jointly to discuss this issue in St. Louis. We took the following polls:
SG9 and LWG believe this is not a defect.
SF | F | N | A | SA |
---|---|---|---|---|
3 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
Weak consensus
A: It's a footgun and footguns are defects
SG9 and LWG agree that the standard could do something to create fewer sharp edges here, and we encourage a paper exploring options.
SF | F | N | A | SA |
---|---|---|---|---|
4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
Strong consensus.
The meeting minutes say that the weak consensus implies that LEWG should be asked to confirm NAD, is that right? Or should we just close as NAD?
Could SG9 please look at https://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/issue4019 and decide if we want a change?
If it would require a paper we can ask for one and close the issue.