Open wg21bot opened 2 months ago
A motion for sending directly to LWG for C++26 as a wording fix (skipping EP) was started (ends on Oct 7th): https://lists.isocpp.org/lib-ext/2024/09/27951.php (asking if there's any objection to unanimous consent)
No objection to sending the paper to LWG as a wording fix, motion passed (https://lists.isocpp.org/lib-ext/current/28152.php)
I've just uploaded R1 with a small wording fix, but it wasn't in the recent mailing. We should use R1 when reviewing it in LWG. https://wg21.link/p3379r1
LWG polled this paper in Wroclaw: Poll: put P3379r0 into C++26? |F|A|N| |6|0|0|
LWG paper minutes: https://wiki.edg.com/bin/view/Wg21wroclaw2024/LWG20241118-P3379
I've just uploaded R1 with a small wording fix, but it wasn't in the recent mailing. We should use R1 when reviewing it in LWG. https://wg21.link/p3379r1
I've reverted R1 to draft status, so it doesn't get published in a mailing. The link to the draft is https://isocpp.org/files/papers/D3379R1.html
P3379R0 Constrain std::expected equality operators (Jonathan Wakely)