search

cplusplus / papers

ISO/IEC JTC1 SC22 WG21 paper scheduling and management
606 stars 19 forks source link

P1664 reconstructible_range - a concept for putting ranges back together #578

Open wg21bot opened 4 years ago

wg21bot commented 4 years ago

P1664R0 reconstructible_range - a concept for putting ranges back together (JeanHeyd Meneide)

jensmaurer commented 4 years ago

LEWG in Belfast: We would still like all of these papers (P1391, P1394, P1739, and the new P1664) for C++20.

wg21bot commented 4 years ago

P1664R1 reconstructible_range - a concept for putting ranges back together (JeanHeyd Meneide)

wg21bot commented 4 years ago

P1664R2 reconstructible_range - a concept for putting ranges back together (JeanHeyd Meneide)

jensmaurer commented 4 years ago

quote by Marshall cplusplus/nbballot#268: P1664R2 was in the post-Belfast mailing targeting C++23.

ben-craig commented 3 years ago

Talked with authors. The paper needs a new revision, and the solution has different merits than what is listed in the design section. Back to LEWG

wg21bot commented 3 years ago

P1664R3 reconstructible_range - a concept for putting ranges back together (JeanHeyd Meneide)

inbal2l commented 3 years ago

2021-01-06 Library Evolution Telecon Minutes

Chair: Inbal Levi

Champion: JeanHeyd Meneide

Minute Taker: Ben Craig

Start: 2021-01-06 11:02 Pacific

Summary

The mechanism is generally supported, but few design issues came up, among them: We can cover both cases (static function and other) with different wording, consider accepting a range instead of iterator pair.

The author was suggested to bring the paper to an unofficial ranges workgroup meeting.

Outcome

The next revision should address the design issues mentioned. No polls where taken.

wg21bot commented 3 years ago

P1664R4 reconstructible_range - a concept for putting ranges back together (JeanHeyd Meneide)

inbal2l commented 2 years ago

Was seen by SG9 (Ranges) on 2021-08-09 (Full Minutes)

Polls

POLL: We like the direction of the solution proposed in P1664R5: reconstructible_range - a concept for putting ranges back together and would like to spend more time on it (the CPOs requires extra motivation and discussion).

SF F N A SA
3 6 2 0 0

Outcome: Consensus in Favor

Summary

SG9 is in favor of the solution, and would continue discussion on the CPOs based on the revised version. Author was recommended to add motivation / example for each overload, and expected usage.

wg21bot commented 2 years ago

P1664R5 reconstructible_range - a concept for putting ranges back together (JeanHeyd Meneide)

inbal2l commented 2 years ago

Was seen by SG9 (Ranges) on 2021-12-20 (Full Minutes)

Polls

No polls were taken

Summary

The author got good directions and was recommended to separate the use cases for the utility. The paper needs more review time from SG9. The next revision should be seen again in SG9. Tentatively scheduled for Jan 10th.

wg21bot commented 2 years ago

P1664R6 reconstructible_range - a concept for putting ranges back together (JeanHeyd Meneide)

wg21bot commented 2 years ago

P1664R7 reconstructible_range - a concept for putting ranges back together (JeanHeyd Meneide, Hannes Hauswedell)

JeffGarland commented 2 years ago

Removing the 23 label since it's past the freeze.

inbal2l commented 8 months ago

@dhollman please check if the authors would like to have R7 scheduled for SG9 or prefer to have additional revision first (targeting C++26).

foonathan commented 1 week ago

At least one author still interested but with no time. Closing until something new materializes.

foonathan commented 1 week ago

The other author will produce a new revision at some point.