Open ericniebler opened 10 months ago
@ericniebler Is the classification as P1 enhancement here based on the assumption that it's currently ill-formed to apply stopped_as_optional()
to a sender that completes with set_value_t()
in that we can later make this well-formed as completing with set_value_t(optional<monostate>)
?
Yes
Issue by ericniebler Friday Oct 22, 2021 at 00:55 GMT Originally opened as https://github.com/NVIDIA/stdexec/issues/222
... by mapping void to some unit (monostate?) type.