Open vinniefalco opened 1 year ago
If we do what doxygen does, C::type
will have no documentation. This seems correct because C::type
is semantically different from T in that its documentation usually describes what it means in the context of C
. However, it's still not unreasonable to assume @copydoc T
there.
What if there is additional commenting?
I think this is an independent question because it might happen in other contexts. But the answer is that the additional comments are appended because @copydoc foo()
is roughly equivalent to doing:
\brief \copybrief foo()
\details \copydetails foo()
Consider:
Should
type
automatically reference the Javadoc forT
because it does not have its own doc? Or should this be an option? Or should we require the user write@copydoc
:What if there is additional commenting?