Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
Should these changes properly be made against nupas, if we still want that in
the tree instead of the old upas?
Original comment by stanley....@gmail.com
on 20 Apr 2012 at 7:33
maybe? but i'm not using nupas nor is it in 9front.
did nupas change marshal as well? i thought it
mainly improved upas/fs to use a index to not
having to load all mails into memory...
Original comment by cinap_le...@felloff.net
on 20 Apr 2012 at 8:47
I hadn't diffed them until just now. It looks like nupas' marshal adds support
for bcc, some changes to pgp interaction, and a few other changes I didn't
immediately understand. Nupas' upas/fs definitely works better (read: much,
much faster) with gmail's imap, but also crashes every couple of days.
Original comment by stanley....@gmail.com
on 21 Apr 2012 at 3:04
There are some further changes in nupas that cause it to behave differently in
ways I don't understand. I've stopped using it.
It looks like some headers in the body of the message are already supported. I
haven't experimented with this yet but I'm willing to try.
Original comment by stanley....@gmail.com
on 5 May 2012 at 6:25
Revision 2ba97c7c913b adds support for attach: and inline: in the message body.
Original comment by stanley....@gmail.com
on 1 Jan 2013 at 2:14
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
cinap_le...@felloff.net
on 20 Apr 2012 at 4:41