Error building LLVM-GCC

[GoogleCodeExporter]

What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Follow toolchain build process from scratch
2. At `make install' for LLVM-GCC (third to last step), the build fails
with the following error:

/usr/bin/install -c mkheaders
/usr/local/libexec/gcc/arm-apple-darwin/4.0.1/install-tools/mkheaders
c++ -c -g -O2 -DIN_GCC -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -pedantic -Wno-long-long
-Wno-variadic-macros -mdynamic-no-pic -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -Wno-unused
-DTARGET_NAME=\"arm-apple-darwin\" -DNDEBUG -DENABLE_LLVM
-I/Users/mccreary/iPhone/llvm-svn/include  -D_DEBUG  -D_GNU_SOURCE
-D__STDC_LIMIT_MACROS   -I. -I. -I../../../llvm-gcc-4.0-iphone/gcc
-I../../../llvm-gcc-4.0-iphone/gcc/.
-I../../../llvm-gcc-4.0-iphone/gcc/../include -I./../intl
-I../../../llvm-gcc-4.0-iphone/gcc/../libcpp/include 
-I/Users/mccreary/iPhone/llvm-svn/include
-I/Users/mccreary/iPhone/llvm-svn/include
../../../llvm-gcc-4.0-iphone/gcc/llvm-backend.cpp -o llvm-backend.o
../../../llvm-gcc-4.0-iphone/gcc/llvm-backend.cpp: In function 'void
llvm_initialize_backend()':
../../../llvm-gcc-4.0-iphone/gcc/llvm-backend.cpp:191: error:
'createBFS_DAGScheduler' was not declared in this scope
make[1]: *** [llvm-backend.o] Error 1
make: *** [install-gcc] Error 2

What is the expected output? What do you see instead?

I expected the build process to produce a working LLVM-GCC compiler

What version of the product are you using? On what operating system?

iphone-dev revision 198, llvm-svn revision 42600, MacOS X 10.4.10, xcode
8m2540a (2.5 preview)

Original issue reported on code.google.com by sean.mcc...@gmail.com on 4 Oct 2007 at 12:26

[GoogleCodeExporter]

It seems like everybody on the platform is having this problem; I reported it as
issue 70, but my title was terrible.  Frustrating to wait, but I know that the
firmware project is the most important right now.  Is anyone still able to 
build on
platforms OTHER than OSX 10.4.10?

Original comment by tom.manc...@gmail.com on 4 Oct 2007 at 1:23

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Duplicate of issue 70

Original comment by Phi...@gmail.com on 16 Oct 2007 at 1:08

• Changed state: Duplicate