Closed LittleLydia closed 4 years ago
Do you have some binaries for testing purpose? Both raw binary and flatted binary with symbols compiled would be better.
If not, I can only have a try with aarch64
in Linux env.
Thanks for the reply. I can provide some flattened arm64 binary with its raw binary later.
Here it is!
Thanks! I'll have a try.
@LittleLydia Currently, the aarch64 is supported via https://github.com/cq674350529/deflat/pull/7.
By the way, I didn't come accross any issues related to cle
at the moment. In addition, another issue was fixed when more than one function call exist in the same block.
You can have a try. If any issues, feedback is welcomed.
Thanks!
Cle does not support loading two and more binaries at the same time. So if a macho depends on many libraries, it will fail. Have emailed you a practical example and the log file. You can take a look.
I tried the binary you provided with the latest angr
, and I didn't came across the issue you mentioned.
However, angr
seems to output wrong blocks of the target function. In addition, the flatted structure of the target function is different from those in demo binary. It'll take some time to debug it, since the binary is soooooooo big.
By the way, are you sure the target function is flatted?
Thanks!
@LittleLydia Oops, it's hard for me to debug this binary currently. Since it's soooooooooo big, it will consume all my computer resources(CPU
, memory
) every time I run it with angr
. Also, the IDA is also sloooooooooow to respond.
It seems that one angr dependency cle doesn't support mach-o backend very well. What would be the possible ways to solve it?